NRS 695G.275
Experimental or investigational health care service or treatment: Request for external review
- request for expedited external review.
1.
Within 4 months after receipt of a notice of an adverse determination pursuant to NRS 695G.245 that involves a denial of coverage based on a determination that the health care service or treatment recommended or requested is experimental or investigational, a covered person or the covered person’s authorized representative may file a request for external review with the Office for Consumer Health Assistance pursuant to this section.2.
A covered person or the covered person’s authorized representative may make an oral request for an expedited external review of the adverse determination pursuant to NRS 695G.245 that involves a denial of coverage based on a determination that the health care service or treatment recommended or requested is experimental or investigational if the covered person’s treating physician certifies, in writing, that the recommended or requested health care service or treatment that is the subject of the request would be significantly less effective if not promptly initiated.3.
Upon receipt of a request for an expedited external review pursuant to subsection 2, the Office for Consumer Health Assistance shall immediately notify the health carrier.4.
Immediately upon notice of a request for an expedited external review pursuant to subsection 2, the health carrier shall determine whether the request meets the requirements for review set forth in subsection 12. The health carrier shall immediately notify the Office for Consumer Health Assistance and the covered person and, if applicable, the covered person’s authorized representative, of its determination regarding eligibility.5.
The Commissioner may specify the form for the notice of initial determination pursuant to subsection 4 and any supporting information to be included in the notice.6.
The notice of initial determination required by subsection 4 must include a statement that a health carrier’s initial determination that a request which is ineligible for external review may be appealed to the Office for Consumer Health Assistance.7.
The Office for Consumer Health Assistance may determine that a request for an expedited external review is eligible for external review pursuant to subsection 12 and require that it be referred for expedited external review notwithstanding a health carrier’s initial determination that the request is ineligible.8.
In making a determination pursuant to subsection 7, the decision of the Office for Consumer Health Assistance must be made in accordance with the terms of the covered person’s health benefit plan and is subject to all applicable provisions of the external review process.9.
Upon receipt of the notice that the request for expedited external review meets the requirements for review, the Office for Consumer Health Assistance shall immediately assign an independent review organization to conduct the expedited external review from the list of approved independent review organizations compiled and maintained by the Commissioner pursuant to NRS 683A.3715 and notify the health carrier of the name of the assigned independent review organization.10.
Upon receipt of the notice pursuant to subsection 9, the health carrier or utilization review organization shall provide or transmit any documents and information considered in making the adverse determination to the assigned independent review organization electronically or by telephone or facsimile, or any other available expeditious method.11.
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 3, within 1 business day after receipt of a request for external review pursuant to subsection 1, the Office for Consumer Health Assistance shall notify the health carrier.12.
Within 5 business days after receipt of the notice sent pursuant to subsection 11, the health carrier shall conduct and complete a preliminary review of the request to determine whether:(a)
The person is or was a covered person in the health benefit plan at the time the health care service or treatment was recommended or requested or, in the case of a retrospective review, was a covered person in the health benefit plan at the time the health care service or treatment was provided;(b)
The recommended or requested health care service or treatment that is the subject of the adverse determination:(1)
Would be a covered benefit under the covered person’s health benefit plan but for the health carrier’s determination that the health care service or treatment is experimental or investigational for a particular medical condition; and(2)
Is not explicitly listed as an excluded benefit under the covered person’s health benefit plan;(c)
The covered person’s treating physician has certified that one of the following situations is applicable:(1)
Standard health care services or treatments have not been effective in improving the condition of the covered person;(2)
Standard health care services or treatments are not medically appropriate for the covered person; or(3)
There is no available standard health care service or treatment covered by the health carrier that is more beneficial than the recommended or requested health care service or treatment described in paragraph (d);(d)
The covered person’s treating physician:(1)
Has recommended a health care service or treatment that the physician certifies, in writing, is likely to be more beneficial to the covered person, in the physician’s opinion, than any available standard health care services or treatments; or(2)
Who is a licensed, board certified or board eligible physician qualified to practice in the area of medicine appropriate to treat the covered person’s condition, has certified in writing that scientifically valid studies using accepted protocols demonstrate that the health care service or treatment requested by the covered person that is the subject of the adverse determination is likely to be more beneficial to the covered person than any available standard health care services or treatments;(e)
The covered person has exhausted the health carrier’s internal grievance process as set forth in NRS 695G.200 to 695G.230, inclusive, unless the covered person is not required to exhaust the health carrier’s internal grievance process; and(f)
The covered person has provided all the information and forms required by the Office for Consumer Health Assistance to process an external review, including the release form provided pursuant to subsection 6 of NRS 695G.245.13.
Within 1 business day after completion of the preliminary review, the health carrier shall notify the Office for Consumer Health Assistance and the covered person, and, if applicable, the covered person’s authorized representative, in writing, whether the request is:(a)
Complete;(b)
Eligible for external review;(c)
Not complete, in which case the health carrier shall include in the notice the information or materials that are needed to make the request complete; or(d)
Not eligible for external review, in which case the health carrier shall include in the notice the reasons for its ineligibility.14.
The Commissioner may specify the form for the notice of initial determination pursuant to subsection 13 and any supporting information to be included in the notice.15.
The notice of initial determination must include a statement informing the covered person and, if applicable, the covered person’s authorized representative that a health carrier’s initial determination that a request which is ineligible for external review may be appealed to the Office for Consumer Health Assistance.16.
The Office for Consumer Health Assistance may determine that a request is eligible for external review pursuant to subsection 12 and require that it be referred for external review notwithstanding a health carrier’s initial determination that the request is ineligible.17.
In making a determination pursuant to subsection 16, the decision of the Office for Consumer Health Assistance must be made in accordance with the terms of the covered person’s health benefit plan and is subject to all applicable provisions of the external review process.18.
When a health carrier determines that a request is eligible for external review pursuant to subsection 12, the health carrier shall notify the Office for Consumer Health Assistance and the covered person and, if applicable, the covered person’s authorized representative.19.
Within 1 business day after receipt of the notice from the health carrier that the external review request is eligible for external review pursuant to subsection 18, the Office for Consumer Health Assistance shall:(a)
Assign an independent review organization from the list of approved independent review organizations compiled and maintained by the Commissioner pursuant to NRS 683A.3715 to conduct the external review;(b)
Notify the health carrier of the name of the assigned independent review organization; and(c)
Notify in writing the covered person and, if applicable, the covered person’s authorized representative that the request is eligible for external review and provide the name of the assigned independent review organization.20.
The Office for Consumer Health Assistance shall include in the notice provided to the covered person and, if applicable, the covered person’s authorized representative pursuant to subsection 19 a statement that the covered person or the covered person’s authorized representative may submit in writing to the assigned independent review organization within 5 business days after receipt of the notice provided pursuant to subsection 19 additional information that the independent review organization shall consider when conducting the external review. The independent review organization may accept and consider additional information submitted after the 5 business days have elapsed.21.
Within 1 business day after receipt of the notice of assignment to conduct the external review pursuant to subsection 19, the assigned independent review organization shall:(a)
Select one or more clinical reviewers to conduct the external review, as it determines is appropriate; and(b)
Based on the opinion of the clinical reviewer, or opinions if more than one clinical reviewer has been selected to conduct the external review, make a decision to uphold or reverse the adverse determination.22.
In selecting clinical reviewers pursuant to paragraph (a) of subsection 21, the assigned independent review organization shall select health care professionals who meet the minimum qualifications described in NRS 683A.372 and through clinical experience in the past 3 years, are experts in the treatment of the covered person’s condition and knowledgeable about the recommended or requested health care service or treatment.23.
The covered person, the covered person’s authorized representative, if applicable, and the health carrier may not choose or control the choice of the health care professionals to be selected to conduct the external review.24.
In accordance with subsections 37 to 41, inclusive, each clinical reviewer shall provide a written opinion to the assigned independent review organization regarding whether the recommended or requested health care service or treatment should be covered.25.
In reaching an opinion, clinical reviewers are not bound by any decisions or conclusions reached during the health carrier’s utilization review process as set forth in NRS 683A.375 to 683A.379, inclusive, or the health carrier’s internal grievance process as set forth in NRS 695G.200 to 695G.230, inclusive.26.
Within 5 business days after receipt of the notice pursuant to subsection 19, the health carrier or utilization review organization shall provide to the assigned independent review organization any documents and information considered in making the adverse determination.27.
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 28, failure by the health carrier or utilization review organization to provide the documents and information within the time specified in subsection 26 must not delay the conduct of the external review.28.
If the health carrier or utilization review organization fails to provide the documents and information within the time specified in subsection 26, the assigned independent review organization may terminate the external review and make a decision to reverse the adverse determination.29.
If the independent review organization elects to terminate the external review and reverse the adverse determination pursuant to subsection 28, the independent review organization shall immediately notify the covered person, the covered person’s authorized representative, if applicable, the health carrier and the Office for Consumer Health Assistance.30.
Each clinical reviewer selected pursuant to subsection 21 shall review all the information and documents received pursuant to subsections 20 and 26.31.
The assigned independent review organization shall forward any information submitted by the covered person or the covered person’s authorized representative pursuant to subsection 20 to the health carrier within 1 business day after receipt of the information.32.
Upon receipt of the information required to be forwarded pursuant to subsection 31, the health carrier may reconsider the adverse determination that is the subject of the external review.33.
Reconsideration by the health carrier of its adverse determination pursuant to subsection 32 must not delay or terminate the external review.34.
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 28, the external review may only be terminated before completion if the health carrier decides, upon completion of its reconsideration, to reverse its adverse determination and provide coverage or payment for the recommended or requested health care service or treatment that is the subject of the adverse determination.35.
If the health carrier reverses its adverse determination pursuant to subsection 28, the health carrier shall immediately notify the covered person, the covered person’s authorized representative, if applicable, the assigned independent review organization and the Office for Consumer Health Assistance in writing of its decision.36.
The assigned independent review organization shall terminate the external review upon receipt of the notice from the health carrier pursuant to subsection 35.37.
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 39, within 20 days after being selected in accordance with subsection 21 to conduct the external review, each clinical reviewer shall provide an opinion to the assigned independent review organization pursuant to subsection 41 regarding whether the recommended or requested health care service or treatment should be covered.38.
Except for an opinion provided pursuant to subsection 39, each clinical reviewer’s opinion must be in writing and include the following:(a)
A description of the covered person’s medical condition;(b)
A description of the indicators relevant to determine if there is sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the recommended or requested health care service or treatment is more likely to be beneficial to the covered person than any available standard health care services or treatments and the adverse risks of the recommended or requested health care service or treatment would not be substantially increased over those of available standard health care services or treatments;(c)
A description and analysis of any medical or scientific evidence considered in reaching the opinion;(d)
A description and analysis of any evidence-based standards used as a basis for the opinion; and(e)
Information concerning whether the reviewer’s rationale for the opinion is based on the provisions of subsection 41.39.
For an expedited external review, each clinical reviewer shall provide an opinion orally or in writing to the assigned independent review organization as expeditiously as the covered person’s medical condition or circumstances requires, but in no event not more than 5 calendar days after being selected in accordance with subsection 21.40.
If the opinion provided pursuant to subsection 39 was not in writing, within 48 hours after providing that notice, the clinical reviewer shall provide written confirmation of the opinion to the assigned independent review organization and include the information required pursuant to subsection 38.41.
In addition to the documents and information provided pursuant to subsections 10 and 26, each clinical reviewer, to the extent the information or documents are available and the reviewer considers them appropriate, shall consider the following in reaching an opinion:(a)
The covered person’s medical records;(b)
The attending health care professional’s recommendation;(c)
Consulting reports from appropriate health care professionals and other documents submitted by the health carrier, covered person, the covered person’s authorized representative or the covered person’s treating provider;(d)
The terms of coverage under the covered person’s health benefit plan with the health carrier to ensure that, but for the health carrier’s determination that the recommended or requested health care service or treatment that is the subject of the opinion is experimental or investigational, the reviewer’s opinion is not contrary to the terms of coverage under the health benefit plan; and(e)
Whether:(1)
The recommended or requested health care service or treatment has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration, if applicable, for the condition; or(2)
Medical or scientific evidence or evidence-based standards demonstrate that the expected benefits of the recommended or requested health care service or treatment is more likely to be beneficial to the covered person than any available standard health care services or treatments and the adverse risks of the recommended or requested health care service or treatment would not be substantially increased over those of available standard health care services or treatments.42.
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 43, within 20 days after receipt of the opinion of each clinical reviewer pursuant to subsection 41, the assigned independent review organization, in accordance with subsection 45 or 46, shall make a decision and provide written notice of the decision to the covered person, the covered person’s authorized representative, if applicable, the health carrier and the Office for Consumer Health Assistance and include the information required pursuant to subsection 50.43.
For an expedited external review, within 48 hours after receipt of the opinion of each clinical reviewer pursuant to subsection 41, the assigned independent review organization, in accordance with subsection 45 or 46, shall make a decision and provide notice of the decision orally or in writing to the covered person, the covered person’s authorized representative, if applicable, the health carrier and the Office for Consumer Health Assistance.44.
If the notice provided pursuant to subsection 43 was not in writing, within 48 hours after providing that notice, the assigned independent review organization shall provide written confirmation of the decision to the covered person, the covered person’s authorized representative, if applicable, the health carrier and the Office for Consumer Health Assistance and include the information required pursuant to subsection 50.45.
If a majority of the clinical reviewers recommend that the recommended or requested health care service or treatment should be covered, the independent review organization shall make a decision to reverse the health carrier’s adverse determination.46.
If a majority of the clinical reviewers recommend that the recommended or requested health care service or treatment should not be covered, the independent review organization shall make a decision to uphold the health carrier’s adverse determination.47.
If the clinical reviewers are evenly split as to whether the recommended or requested health care service or treatment should be covered, the independent review organization shall obtain the opinion of an additional clinical reviewer in order for the independent review organization to make a decision based on the opinions of a majority of the clinical reviewers pursuant to subsection 45 or 46.48.
The additional clinical reviewer selected pursuant to subsection 47 shall use the same information to reach an opinion as the clinical reviewers who have already submitted their opinions pursuant to subsection 41.49.
The selection of an additional clinical reviewer pursuant to subsection 47 must not extend the time within which the assigned independent review organization is required to make a decision based on the opinions of the clinical reviewers pursuant to subsection 42.50.
The independent review organization shall include in the notice provided pursuant to subsection 42 or 44:(a)
A general description of the reason for the request for external review;(b)
The written opinion of each clinical reviewer, including the recommendation of each clinical reviewer as to whether the recommended or requested health care service or treatment should be covered and the rationale for the reviewer’s recommendation;(c)
The date the independent review organization was assigned by the Office for Consumer Health Assistance to conduct the external review;(d)
The date on which the external review was conducted;(e)
The date of the decision;(f)
The principal reason or reasons for the decision; and(g)
The rationale for the decision.51.
Upon receipt of a notice of a decision pursuant to subsection 42 or 44 reversing the adverse determination, the health carrier shall immediately approve coverage of the recommended or requested health care service or treatment that was the subject of the adverse determination.52.
The assignment by the Office for Consumer Health Assistance of an approved independent review organization to conduct an external review in accordance with this section must be done on a random basis among those approved independent review organizations qualified to conduct the particular external review based on the nature of the health care service or treatment that is the subject of the adverse determination and other circumstances, including concerns regarding conflicts of interest pursuant to subsection 4 of NRS 683A.372.53.
As used in this section:(a)
“Best evidence” means evidence based on:(1)
Randomized clinical trials;(2)
If randomized clinical trials are not available, cohort studies or case-control studies;(3)
If the methods described in subparagraphs (1) and (2) are not available, case series; or(4)
If the methods described in subparagraphs (1), (2) and (3) are not available, expert opinion.(b)
“Evidence-based standard” means the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of the current best evidence based on the overall systematic review of research in making decisions about the care of an individual patient.(c)
“Randomized clinical trial” means a controlled, prospective study of patients who have been randomized into an experimental group and a control group at the beginning of the study with only the experimental group of patients receiving a specific intervention, which includes study of the groups for variables and anticipated outcomes over time.
Source:
Section 695G.275 — Experimental or investigational health care service or treatment: Request for external review; request for expedited external review., https://www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-695G.html#NRS695GSec275.