Public.Law logo Nevada.Public.Law
  • Nevada Revised Statutes
  • Join
  • Login
  1. Home
  2. Nevada NRS
  3. Trade Regulations & Practices
  4. Deceptive Trade Practices
  5. Ticket Resellers & Secondary Ticket Exchanges

Ticket Resellers and Secondary Ticket Exchanges

Sections

598.397
Definitions.
598.398
Restrictions on use of Internet robots.
598.3971
“Athletic contest” defined.
598.3972
“Entertainment facility” defined.
598.3973
“Internet robot” defined.
598.3974
“Live entertainment event” defined.
598.3975
“Resale” and “resell” defined.
598.3976
“Reseller” defined.
598.3977
“Ticket” defined.
598.3978
Use of trademarked or copyrighted material by reseller or secondary ticket exchange
598.3979
Prohibited acts relating to resale of tickets.
598.3981
Establishment of hotline and Internet website to receive complaints
598.3982
Civil action
598.3983
Criminal penalty.
598.3984
Criminal penalty for violations relating to certain government affiliated facilities.
598.39745
“Primary ticket provider” defined.
598.39765
“Rights holder” defined.
598.39795
Resale of ticket without first disclosing total amount to be charged prohibited.
REMOVE ADS




Stay Connected

Join thousands of people who receive monthly site updates.

Subscribe

Instagram Facebook Twitter Our GitHub Page

Committed to Public Service

We will always provide free access to the current law. In addition, we provide special support for non-profit, educational, and government users. Through social entre­pre­neurship, we’re lowering the cost of legal services and increasing citizen access.

Navigate

  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Public.Law
  • System status
  • Dictionary
  • International law
  • USA
    • California
    • Nevada
    • New York
    • Oregon
    • Texas

Location: https://nevada.public.law/statutes/nrs_chapter_598_sub-chapter_ticket_resellers_and_secondary_ticket_exchanges

Blank Outline Levels

In some ORS sections, the legislature has left some outline levels empty.

For example, the original source text of ORS 166.274 reads, in part:

(3) A person may apply [...]
(4)(a) A person petitioning for relief [...]

Here, (3), (4), and (4)(a) are all outline levels, but (4) was intentionally left blank by its authors. And so, when OregonLaws displays sections like this, we add a button to indicate that the blank outline level isn't a mistake. We hope this is the clearest way to present the text.

Do you have an opinion about this solution? Drop us a line. We'd love to hear from you.