Public.Law logo Nevada.Public.Law
  • Nevada Revised Statutes
  • Join
  • Login
  1. Home
  2. Nevada NRS
  3. Remedies; Spec. Actions & Proceedings
  4. Actions & Proceedings in Particular Cases Concerning Persons
  5. Liability of Persons Who Engage in Right to Petition or Free Speech in Direct Connection With an....

Liability of Persons Who Engage in Right to Petition or Free Speech in Direct Connection With an....

Sections

41.635
Definitions.
41.637
“Good faith communication in furtherance of the right to petition or the right to free speech in direct connection with an issue of public concern” defined.
41.640
“Political subdivision” defined.
41.650
Limitation of liability.
41.660
Attorney General or chief legal officer of political subdivision may defend or provide support to person sued for engaging in right to petition or free speech in direct connection with an issue of public concern
41.670
Award of reasonable costs, attorney’s fees and monetary relief under certain circumstances
REMOVE ADS




Stay Connected

Join thousands of people who receive monthly site updates.

Subscribe

Instagram Facebook Twitter Our GitHub Page

Committed to Public Service

We will always provide free access to the current law. In addition, we provide special support for non-profit, educational, and government users. Through social entre­pre­neurship, we’re lowering the cost of legal services and increasing citizen access.

Navigate

  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Public.Law
  • System status
  • Dictionary
  • International law
  • USA
    • California
    • Nevada
    • New York
    • Oregon
    • Texas

Location: https://nevada.public.law/statutes/nrs_chapter_41_sub-chapter_liability_of_persons_who_engage_in_right_to_petition_or_free_speech_in_direct_connection_with_an....

Blank Outline Levels

In some ORS sections, the legislature has left some outline levels empty.

For example, the original source text of ORS 166.274 reads, in part:

(3) A person may apply [...]
(4)(a) A person petitioning for relief [...]

Here, (3), (4), and (4)(a) are all outline levels, but (4) was intentionally left blank by its authors. And so, when OregonLaws displays sections like this, we add a button to indicate that the blank outline level isn't a mistake. We hope this is the clearest way to present the text.

Do you have an opinion about this solution? Drop us a line. We'd love to hear from you.